DataToolsLab
XML Tools

XML to YAML

Convert well-formed XML into equivalent YAML, with attributes prefixed @ the same way the XML↔JSON converter works.

Loading tool…

What is XML → YAML?

An XML-to-YAML converter for making a document readable in a config-shaped format — the direction people want when a SOAP response or a feed has to be inspected, stored or reviewed by eye.

How it works

The tree is rendered with the same conventions as the existing XML↔JSON converter: `@name` for attributes, `#text` for the text of an element that also has attributes or children, and nested maps and sequences following the document's own structure. Values become numbers or booleans only when every occurrence of that field looks like one, and strings that would change meaning unquoted are quoted. Coercion can be switched off entirely to keep everything as text.

  1. Paste the document. Drop in XML, a schema, a feed or an XPath expression. Everything is parsed in the page: no upload, no server round trip, and the tools keep working with the network switched off.
  2. Set the options that match your document. Indent unit, whether to keep comments, which dialect, which output method. The defaults are the safe ones — nothing that changes meaning is enabled for you.
  3. Read the result, then copy or download it. Results appear as you type, copy straight to the clipboard, and download with a sensible filename (.xml, .xsd, .csv). Reset returns every field to its default.

Examples

A minified document from an API response

Paste one line of XML and the Formatter indents it, wraps long start tags one attribute per line and normalises empty elements — without touching text inside mixed content.

An XPath that works in Chrome and not in your servlet

The XPath Tester evaluates against a real tree and reports the axis or function it cannot support, instead of returning zero nodes and letting you guess why.

A document that will not parse

The Validator gives line and column for every mismatched tag, stray ampersand and duplicate attribute, with the reason in words: which open element was expected, which was found.

A schema that only half matches your data

The XSD Validator marks each violation with the path of the offending node, and the Schema Generator goes the other way — inferring a starting-point XSD from real documents.

Common mistakes

Assuming a pretty-printer cannot change meaning

Whitespace between elements is often insignificant, but inside mixed content it is not: `<p>Hello <b>world</b></p>` must stay on one line. Formatting here re-indents element-only content and leaves mixed content alone.

Treating a validation pass as proof of interoperability

The DTD and XSD validators implement honest subsets. A document reported valid here can still be rejected by a full validator that understands identity constraints, substitution groups or XSD 1.1 assertions — each page lists what it does not cover.

Reading the whole document because the parser did

A DOCTYPE is not inert. If your parser resolves external entities, pasting an untrusted document is enough to read a file or call an internal URL. The XXE Risk Checker shows what a document asks for; the fix is in the parser configuration.

Forgetting that attributes and elements are not interchangeable

`<id>1</id>` and `id="1"` mean different things to every schema and every XPath. When converting to CSV or YAML the distinction is preserved (`@id`), because flattening it away is the change that costs an afternoon later.

Frequently asked questions

Why is my customer ID 00417 not a number?

Because leading zeros are information. A field whose values all look numeric is only coerced when doing so cannot change the value — `00417` comes out as a string, `417` as a number. Switch coercion off when you want a faithful text rendering instead.

Which attribute convention is used?

The same one as this site's XML↔JSON converter: `@name` for attributes, `#text` for text that sits next to attributes or children. Keeping the two consistent means a document taken through JSON and YAML lands in the same shape both ways.

Is the YAML guaranteed to round-trip?

To the same tree, yes, for the constructs YAML can express: elements, attributes, text, order and nesting. Comments, CDATA boundaries and the XML declaration have no YAML equivalent and are dropped — if those matter, the document is not a configuration file and YAML is the wrong destination.

Online